#TRA Lies

[nevereveraster]

TRA LIES: Nex Benedict

So user @ny4n4rchy chose to deliberately lie about the tragic suicide death of Nex Benedict, presumably because this user cannot use this child's death as a talking point if the truth comes out. Since this user has chosen to deliberately lie about this child's suicide, let's go with actual immutable facts in reality, as opposed to @ny4n4rchy's baseless accusation of falsehood due to upset feelings that a child's death cannot be weaponized. Nex Benedict was originally lionized and martyred by the trans community for being beaten to death for being trans. Even though the trans community did not have the facts, they nonetheless created a narrative about what caused Nex's death. You can find news reports on Nex's autopsy with a ten-second google search. Compiling the following data took less than 5 miniutes. Here are the facts: Nex Benedict died of an overdose. Here is the toxicology report.

Nex Benedict was sexually abused by an immediate family member. Here is the case summary.

A head wound did not cause this child's death. This child died of a medication-overdose suicide. This child had previous sexual abuse as recent trauma history.

Instead of performing any independent effort to ensure correct material facts, user @ny4n4rchy instead chose to lie about the suicide death of a sexual abuse victim because that lie was convenient in furthering the trans cause. This is reprehensible behavior on the part of @ny4n4rchy. My only commentary is along the lines of "my God, this child was raped by a parent. This child was in so much pain and confusion that suicide became an option to pursue. Have some fucking respect, this child is not your martyr for the cause. You don't even know this kid." (Notice also this user @ny4n4rchy's open use of a slur for gay men and a slur for trans-identified people. A slur is a slur. It does not speak highly of @ny4n4rchy's character.)

[nevereveraster]

Wow, what a predictable deliberate mischaracterization of detransition and detransitioners. Let's let the public postings from confused detransitioning kids and young adults speaks for themselves (credit @redditreceipts) since @assignedmale wants to deliberately lie about this population so badly:

Does that look like informed consent, @assignedmale? Do these questions look like they come from detransitioners who were adequately prepared for their surgical procedures to affirm them? No? Then why did you deliberately misconstrue this?

[tyracaterinagrant]

AMO il me del passato che ha pensato ok jannik giocherà di sabato me lo sento e quindi mi prendo diurna e serale che sono a posto a prescindere e se poi gioca tipo venerdì sera mi strappo i capelli ma ci ho provato . OGNI TANTO prendo decisioni che si rivelano sensate e vantaggiose per il mio futuro capita raramente ma sono così felice sia capitato questa volta

[nevereveraster]

Do you know what I find interesting, @newandnonsense? I've never called a trans person a slur. I've never told a trans person to kill or harm themselves in any way. I've never advocated for violence towards trans people, because that would be abhorrent. I've never, ever claimed that any trans-identified person or ally is subhuman, I've never threatened a trans person or told them they deserve death. I understand how to be a basically decent human being; threatening people is wrong. Implying that someone should attempt or complete suicide is wrong. It's violent and unstable and reflects mental health issues and unresolved emotional trauma.

And yet, whenever I go about my simple acts of dissent, whenever I exercise my right as a human being to say "no" and to continue saying "no" even when someone else wants to force and coerce that "no" into a "yes" through any means possible... I get threats like this. And isn't it interesting! Isn't it so interesting that I have never in my three years of former staunch TRA and trans ally 2006-2021 turned GC "TERF" 2021-2024 even heard of a "TERF" GC woman threatening a trans person, or a TRA, or an ally, never even heard of a trans person being told to "put a gun to your head and pull the trigger you pathetic piece of garbage" ... and yet, I've seen hundreds of posts of TRA receipts where TRAS, allies, and trans people scream at, abuse, threaten, and wish death upon GC "TERF" women (specifically women -- men who are GC aren't called "TERFs", threatened, stalked, and harassed) go out of their way to stalk GC women, attempt to doxx GC women, attempt to and sometimes succeed in ruining GC women's social lives and careers. Even if I hadn't fallen away from believing in trans religion due to 4 separate trans women trying to actively harm me, speak over me, and shut me up and silence me IRL in a 6 month period because "she's more of a woman than [I] am", and "her experience [of believing that women talking about sexual assault in the workplace are attention-seeking liars because she's not been assaulted at work] means I'm a lying attentionwhore bitch for saying it happened to [me]" the violent, aggressive, threatening, coercive, domineering, tyrannical way that trans persons, TRAs, and allies act online would have clued me in that something was fucking screwy. See, actual marginalized groups don't go around threatening others. Actual marginalized groups afraid of harm don't loudly and aggressively try to harm anyone who won't fall in line and get down on their knees to pay fealty.

The way TRAs, allies, and trans people act reminds me of nothing so much as a conquesting, colonializing oppressor class. The methods are the same: "submit or harm and threats of harm will be heaped upon you. Life will become hard for you. Submit, get on your knees, and swear fealty to this new religion or we will threaten to rape you with our girlcocks and encourage you to attempt and complete suicide for daring to have the audacity to challenge our authority by saying no."

It's frightening on a meta, cultural level. It feels like an odd, warped version of emergent new McCarthyism -- except that instead of "communist scum" deserving death and being subhuman and deserving of scorn, threats, violence, surveillance, etc. it is instead women who dare to stand up for our own agency and right to refuse and say "No" who are now the evil boogeyman and convenient scapegoat.

[galloberardi]

Secondo te perché Gravina sta spingendo su Ranieri?

Perche' si vuole salvare il culo ahahhaha. Grav!na e' una delle persone peggiori che ci possano essere che accoltella tutti alle spalle pur di salvarsi il posto. Due allenatori hanno praticamente detto che Grav!na li ha appoggiati fino all'ultimo dandogli fiducia e poi lui li ha accoltellati alle spalle. Palese che non vede che uno dei problemi principali e' proprio lui e quindi pur di non dimettersi continua a esonerare gli allenatori nei momenti sbagliati. Mancini andava esonerato dopo la mancata qualificazione perche' il suo ciclo era finito e non e' stato fatto. Spalletti andava esonerato dopo l'Europeo perche' si vedeva a occhio che qualcosa non andava tra lui e il gruppo, e non e' stato fatto. Adesso che siamo gia' con un piede fuori dal mondiale allora per paura di venire crocifisso Grav!na esonera Spalletti e spinge per l'allenatore che il popolo italiano vuole. Cosi' siccome tutti vogliono Ranieri, se Ranieri accetta, allora Gravina e' stato bravo e si tiene la sua sedia. Questo per dire che non ho niente contro Ranieri come allenatore. Ma la colpa e' di Gravina che non sa fare il suo lavoro e non sa prendere le decisioni nel momento in cui vanno prese. Se Spalletti fosse stato esonerato quando doveva, la situazione ad oggi sarebbe decisamente differente.

[nevereveraster]

The underlying fuming hatred at the audacity of women dressing how we want and still being proud and happy and loving ourselves as women... it's a lot to unpack. What this TikTok is really saying is:

"HOW DARE WOMEN BE PROUD OF BEING WOMEN, HOW DARE WOMEN BE SECURE IN THEMSELVES, AND ALSO NOT PERFORM THE MALE INTERPRETATION OF FEMININITY AND FEMALENESS!! IT SCARES AND ANGERS ME THAT A WOMAN DARE THINK SHE CAN DRESS AND ACT HOW SHE WANTS AND STILL BE CALLED A WOMAN!! WOMEN ARE ONLY ALLOWED TO BE THE NARROW MALE DEFINITION OF ULTRA-FUCKABLE FEMININITY!!"

And meanwhile so many women are just out here living life, giving these religious-cult-obsessed trans losers aneurysms by existing in their bodies and being happy being themselves. Which, ironically, is what the trans movement claims they want people to do.

i cant stand tiktok

okay? we still know we’re women

no we’re actually not “trans masc” and insinuating a gender non conforming person is “trans” is homophobic & plays into sexist gender roles! hope this helps

[omarfor-orchestra]

Andate a fare cabaret insieme vi sto pregando

[linkvcr]

good evenin skysword nation

[ms-revived-frogs]

Except for the fact that Val Whiting wrote this Tweet about sports, in which MtFs actually do have a very clear biological advantage over women. She responded to a thread about chess but I'm pretty sure responded to one of the Tweets that wasn't explicitly about chess. She uses the terms "athletes" and "sports" in a lot of these Tweets so it's fair enough to say she's talking about sports and not chess.

You can see in this screenshot, she's responding not to the initial thread about chess, but to the second Tweet and likely responding to correct the assumption that saying men are biologically stronger = they're biologically better. She explicitly states that while she recognizes the reality that males have more muscle % than females, she knows that this doesn't mean they're inherently better, only more athletically inclined to dominate these types of sports that DO involve muscle.

So in short, you're using a cropped image that removes the context of what Val Whiting was saying. A quick look to Twitter would see that she was not referring to chess, but responding to a comment that was discusses trans athleticism as well. If you're going to accuse other people of being illogical, you're going to have to try better than that.

"why shouldn't men be allowed in womens chess"

because they're men

"so you're saying women are worse at chess?"

no fuckhead thats a whole different sentence

[elipsi]

mi hanno sminchiato la formattazione delle proposte per i cineforum, appena torno in collegio heads will roll

[evadingreallife]

AAA CERCASI che libro faccio leggere a mia nonna di 92 anni che non credo abbia mai letto nulla in vita sua se non le riviste helppp

[nodistar]

probabilmente qualcuno avrà già sottolineato questa somiglianza ma non è un caso che io sia ossessionata sia con i mimmone che con i gallavich

[malachia-il-bibliotecario]

if sneaking pirated pdfs away from a public library is wrong then I don't want to be right

[lesbian-steppenwolf]

NON CI CREDO ADESSO ME LA MANDA LA CONFERMA DI VOTO

[persa-tra-i-miei-pensieri]

Tramonto e Teatro 🎟️😂

[ms-revived-frogs]

Wrong actually. The source that @kahmeokiblog cited was set in the UK. A quick look at the UK's standards for what constitutes a sexual offence do not include offering sex services.

Another article says that the only aspects of prostitution that are illegal in the UK are those committed by pimps which will typically involve human trafficking and sexual exploitation.

So in short, you're lying. Though what I find funny is that, if you consider trans women to be really female, why are you citing an article about female sex predators to counter this argument? If what you say is true that trans women are female, wouldn't this article be ... against your point, and not in favour of it?